A reader inferring that an author is biased exemplifies which type of comprehension?

Critical comprehension involves analyzing and evaluating the information presented in a text. When a reader infers that an author is biased, they are engaging in critical comprehension by assessing the author's perspective and the potential influence it may have on the argument or information being presented. This type of comprehension goes beyond just understanding the literal meaning of the text; it requires the reader to think about the implications, identify biases, and evaluate the credibility and reliability of the information.

In contrast, literal comprehension refers to the straightforward understanding of the words, phrases, and sentences in a text without delving into deeper meanings or biases. Metacognition involves awareness and control over one's own learning processes, including self-monitoring of comprehension. Quantitative dimensions typically relate to measurable aspects of reading, such as fluency or vocabulary levels, which do not encompass the deeper cognitive engagement required to determine biases in text. Thus, recognizing bias is a hallmark of critical comprehension, as it indicates a thoughtful and analytical approach to reading.